Canon EOS-1D Mark III, 10 mp, 10 fps - Page 3

newb4ev3r · 02-27-2007, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RudolF

Trus knp klo kamera2 mahal gak ada Flash nya?

Dapet baca sih katanya karena viewfinder-nya gede Pak, jadinya ga ada space lagi buat flash. Kalo kelas 300D, 350D, 400D bahkan 30D viewfindernya kalah gede dan kalah jernih ama yang kelas 5D and 1D.

dhlee · 02-27-2007, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Winata

Err99 artinya error di koneksi body ke objek lain , bisa koneksi lensa ,koneksi battery/batt.grip atau cable release , coba cabut battery dulu ,kalo masih gak bisa coba cabut lepas lensa , bersihkan point2 kuningan penghubung elektroniknya dgn alkohol dan lap lalu keringkan , andai masih gak bisa coba download firmware EOS type kamera lu di canon.com di download library , save di CF card kosong lalu masukkan kamera lu dan masuk ke menu firmware update

katanya yg point2 kuningan itu bisa pake penghapus pencil digosok2 begitu ya pak? saya sih nda ngerti makanya langsung aja kasih ke tukang servicenya. info yg bagus nih pak hans, saya bisa catat sewaktu2 kejadian lagi saya coba caranya.

newb4ev3r · 02-28-2007, 05:02 PM

Hands-on preview-nya sudah ada di Imaging Resource. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...K3/E1DMK3A.HTM

newb4ev3r · 04-25-2007, 04:44 PM

Ada review lagi untuk preproduction unitnya. Baca reviewnya liat hasil jepretannya. Impressive abis.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...id=7-8738-8908

Sedikit kutipan dari review tersebut:

Of the two dominant digital SLR brands - Canon and Nikon - it's Canon that already produces cameras with the best high-ISO image quality and the most natural-looking darker tones. At ISO 800 and above it's no contest really, and the EOS-1D Mark III only widens the gap further. This camera produces images with the smoothest shadow gradations we've seen in a digital SLR from the two makers. Shadow naturalness is still decent at ISO 3200, which is a first to our eyes. Combine that with lower noise levels at all ISOs, and especially those at the top of the camera's range, and the result is a noticeably better image file whether you shoot at ISO 100 or ISO 3200 all day long.

....................

The camera in Nikon's lineup that's closest in basic specifications to the EOS-1D Mark III is the D2Xs, at least when set to its 6.9MP, 8 fps High Speed Crop mode. Applying the same criteria as above, the EOS-1D Mark III has perhaps a two-stop advantage if you're comparing higher-ISO noise levels only, but this extends to nearly three stops if you place a lot of importance on shadow naturalness (which is, quite frankly, dreadful in the D2Xs at ISO 1600 and 3200, and rarely acceptable even at ISO 800). Comparison photos from the EOS-1D Mark III and D2Xs at ISO 3200 are on the last page of this article. If you need to make pictures in available darkness, Canon has for several years been the better choice, and the EOS-1D Mark III makes the point even more dramatically.

newb4ev3r · 05-08-2007, 03:26 PM

Another review:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...II-Field.shtml

Sedikit kutipan:

Since this article first appeared I've heard from several people by e-mail expressing their concern that my statements about the MKIII's low noise capabilities "can't be right". That there's "no way" that it has at least a stop lower noise than the 5D. That I must be "smoking something" to write that the MKIII has as much as a two stop low noise advantage over other previous Canon cameras.

Well folks – get over it. If anything I have been conservative in my comments.

I'm also apparently not alone with my observations. Rob Galbraith seems to also have been highly impressed with the MKIII's low noise capabilities, as was Art Morris and the folks at Imaging Resource, from which I quote – "we were pleasantly surprised by how good the Mark III's ISO 6,400 images are. Noise is present, of course, but it's at a level that most cameras produce at ISO 1,600 or 800".

I'm certain that as other popular camera review sites eventually publish their technical reports there will be additional gnashing of teeth by those that don't like having their favourite ox gored. T'was always thus.

newb4ev3r · 05-08-2007, 03:27 PM

Buat para golfmania, review ini mungkin menarik:

http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1752

hengky · 05-08-2007, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newb4ev3r

Buat para golfmania, review ini mungkin menarik:

http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1752

Nice "Live View" feature

02-28-2007, 05:02 PM	#33
newb4ev3r (2513) NAC 130 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bandung Posts: 2,215	Re: Canon EOS-1D Mark III, 10 mp, 10 fps Hands-on preview-nya sudah ada di Imaging Resource. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...K3/E1DMK3A.HTM

04-25-2007, 04:44 PM	#34
newb4ev3r (2513) NAC 130 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bandung Posts: 2,215	Re: Canon EOS-1D Mark III, 10 mp, 10 fps Ada review lagi untuk preproduction unitnya. Baca reviewnya liat hasil jepretannya. Impressive abis. http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...id=7-8738-8908 Sedikit kutipan dari review tersebut: Of the two dominant digital SLR brands - Canon and Nikon - it's Canon that already produces cameras with the best high-ISO image quality and the most natural-looking darker tones. At ISO 800 and above it's no contest really, and the EOS-1D Mark III only widens the gap further. This camera produces images with the smoothest shadow gradations we've seen in a digital SLR from the two makers. Shadow naturalness is still decent at ISO 3200, which is a first to our eyes. Combine that with lower noise levels at all ISOs, and especially those at the top of the camera's range, and the result is a noticeably better image file whether you shoot at ISO 100 or ISO 3200 all day long. .................... The camera in Nikon's lineup that's closest in basic specifications to the EOS-1D Mark III is the D2Xs, at least when set to its 6.9MP, 8 fps High Speed Crop mode. Applying the same criteria as above, the EOS-1D Mark III has perhaps a two-stop advantage if you're comparing higher-ISO noise levels only, but this extends to nearly three stops if you place a lot of importance on shadow naturalness (which is, quite frankly, dreadful in the D2Xs at ISO 1600 and 3200, and rarely acceptable even at ISO 800). Comparison photos from the EOS-1D Mark III and D2Xs at ISO 3200 are on the last page of this article. If you need to make pictures in available darkness, Canon has for several years been the better choice, and the EOS-1D Mark III makes the point even more dramatically.

05-08-2007, 03:26 PM	#35
newb4ev3r (2513) NAC 130 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bandung Posts: 2,215	Re: Canon EOS-1D Mark III, 10 mp, 10 fps Another review: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...II-Field.shtml Sedikit kutipan: Since this article first appeared I've heard from several people by e-mail expressing their concern that my statements about the MKIII's low noise capabilities "can't be right". That there's "no way" that it has at least a stop lower noise than the 5D. That I must be "smoking something" to write that the MKIII has as much as a two stop low noise advantage over other previous Canon cameras. Well folks – get over it. If anything I have been conservative in my comments. I'm also apparently not alone with my observations. Rob Galbraith seems to also have been highly impressed with the MKIII's low noise capabilities, as was Art Morris and the folks at Imaging Resource, from which I quote – "we were pleasantly surprised by how good the Mark III's ISO 6,400 images are. Noise is present, of course, but it's at a level that most cameras produce at ISO 1,600 or 800". I'm certain that as other popular camera review sites eventually publish their technical reports there will be additional gnashing of teeth by those that don't like having their favourite ox gored. T'was always thus.

05-08-2007, 03:27 PM	#36
newb4ev3r (2513) NAC 130 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bandung Posts: 2,215	Re: Canon EOS-1D Mark III, 10 mp, 10 fps Buat para golfmania, review ini mungkin menarik: http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1752

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)