Home | Gallery | News | Articles | Forum | Member Profile | Agent | About Us | Contact Us |
» Recent Photo Posts |
|
|
General Photography Forum Masalah seputar dunia photography. |
|
Thread Tools |
11-12-2009, 12:06 PM | #1 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Hai guys
Ada yg sudah test lensa keluaran terbaru canon EF 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro belum ? Dengan harga yg kurang lebih sama dengan EF 135mm f 2.0 L USM ( keduanya sekitar 8 jt an ), prefer lebih pilih yg mana ? Apa kelebihan dan kekurangan masing masing ? thanks b4 atas atensinya |
11-12-2009, 01:58 PM | #2 | |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: cibubur
Posts: 2,893
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Quote:
kayanya blom ada yg eksperimen kang, jadi gimana kalo kang taras beli dua"nya trs bedain. kalo uda tau bagusan yg mana, baru ente buat thread lg kasih tau kita".............; ) |
|
11-13-2009, 12:32 AM | #3 |
NAC 125
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: east taiwan
Posts: 5,179
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
lain loh yg udah jadi fotografer kawakan skrg.. nanyanya soal lensa. dulu mah nanyanya soal ikan gimna jadi merah
|
11-13-2009, 12:46 AM | #4 |
NAC 041
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: city of angel's
Posts: 10,478
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
skrng ngincer ring merah !!!! top markotoppp
__________________
May Aro Force be with U ....Pizz |
11-13-2009, 07:51 AM | #5 |
NAC 019
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,473
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
lebihan 35mm 2.0 versus IS sama Macro
niubi ga bisa kasi masukan buat sesepuh, kasih kutipan aja buat L yang lain "The conclusion is that IS works. With the 75-300/4-5.6 IS lens, you probably gain at least 2 stops, probably three stops, of hand holdability. Under the lowest light conditions, the consumer zoom IS lens can outperform an "L" series non-IS lens (though it wouldn't beat the 300/4L IS lens!). On a tripod, the "L" lens is a clear winner, but for web images the difference will most likely not be visible. If you're shooting action, IS won't help. It stabilizes the lens and allows shooting at slower shutter speeds. Fast action needs a fast shutter speed, which means a fast lens."
__________________
tnQ ...boleh ngutip... semangat juang yang tak pernah mati adalah wujud nyata kebangkitan sejati |
11-13-2009, 09:13 AM | #6 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
|
11-13-2009, 09:15 AM | #7 |
NAC 041
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: city of angel's
Posts: 10,478
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
bukan...gudang tag team xixiii
galak amat ama erlee si om
__________________
May Aro Force be with U ....Pizz |
11-13-2009, 09:21 AM | #8 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
|
11-13-2009, 09:24 AM | #9 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
|
11-13-2009, 09:46 AM | #10 | |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Quote:
tajam dari 70-200 mm f2.8 meskipun yg dengan IS sekalipun. 135mm kasih extender 1.4x ... jadi deh 189mm, meskipun turun 1 stop. jadi gw lewatin aja deh 70-200mm f 2.8 IS yg harganya adubile mahalnya nah kalo 100mm f 2.8 IS USM teknologi IS nya udah hybrid ... 4 stops, untuk macronya 2 stops. jadi pengen nyobain, lensa dengan IS dan jenis macro, untuk type L series, dengan harga 8jt lensa ini layak jg dipertimbangkan . cuma kalo bokehnya pasti kalah dibandingin dengan 135mm f 2.0 |
|
11-13-2009, 10:07 AM | #11 | |
NAC 019
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,473
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Quote:
tapi kalo mo ngesut yang jauh-jauh...bokeh lebih patut dipertimbangkan kalo saya loh ada yang bilang top five canon lenses per 2008 adalah sebagai berikut Average User Rating # of User Ratings price ($) 1 - Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM 9.8 95 4000 2 - Canon EF 85mm f1.2L USM Mark II 9.8 131 2000 3 - Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM 9.8 135 1135 4 - Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM 9.8 245 900 5 - Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 9.8 44 1100
__________________
tnQ ...boleh ngutip... semangat juang yang tak pernah mati adalah wujud nyata kebangkitan sejati |
|
11-13-2009, 10:36 AM | #12 | |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Quote:
yup ... itu dia bro, bokeh antara 135mm sama yg 100mm beda jauh hasilnya ( IMHO ya ), karena FL dan f nya yg 135mm lebih menang . Buat photo outdoor, gw yakin 135mm hasil nya lebih bagus dari 100mm, tapi buat indoor dan lowlight, rasanya 100mm hasilnya lebih menjanjikan, apalagi bisa buat photo macro2 juga . cuma sayangnya body 100mm ini banyak terbuat dari plastik nya, makanya beratnya lebih ringan dibandingin 135mm, padahal jumlah lensanya lebih banyak . dengan shutter speed 1/15, IS nya masih dapat menahan blur hingga 50% - 60% |
|
11-13-2009, 10:59 AM | #13 | |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cibubur
Posts: 3,324
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2009, 11:13 AM | #14 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: jakarta
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
|
11-13-2009, 11:23 AM | #15 |
NAC MEMBER
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cibubur
Posts: 3,324
|
Re: 100mm f 2.8 L IS USM Macro VS 135mm f 2.0 L USM
rencana beli sih udah lama banget yg 135mm tapi bokek terus nih ... jadinya ya nunggu situ aja Kang biar situ ada yg di beli lagian kalo di beli buat penuh2in lemari aja modelnya jg gak protes kok pake lensa canon 50mm f1.4 , yg penting jepret2 ...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|